Jeri
I think some of the confusion for people comes from their
VETS telling them that there are specific numbers which must be present for a titer to be "protective" (case in point: distemper and parvo). Our dog came back with a titer just below the "mark" and I was told he didn't have what was considered a "protective level". Yet this doesn't take into account immunity at the cellular level, and Dr. Schultz has stated that "There are no numbers associated with titers" and that he would prefer for ALL titer tests to simply be "yes" or "no" because of the rampant misunderstanding/confusion/misinterpretations of them....
At present we have no intentions of re-vaxxing for anything. We have a license and tag for Rabies titer...and even though we are moving to a different state, I have no issues with driving 3-4 hours back to get the same next year for our furfamily. He came in at 11:5 when the current standard is :5. The vet was shocked and said he didn't think I'd have any trouble with a titer like that.....had to laugh because I KNEW it would be very high. Vets must not titer much for Rabies and really have no idea what is going on immunologically with the animals they keep "boosting". So said and yes, so frustrating.